<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mouravieff&#8217;s Correction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unurthed.com/2009/10/21/mouravieffs-correction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unurthed.com/2009/10/21/mouravieffs-correction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:42:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabio</title>
		<link>http://unurthed.com/2009/10/21/mouravieffs-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-5313</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unurthed.com/?p=845#comment-5313</guid>
		<description>Although never isolated, C influence in a form of guru, master, guide, or whatever one wish to call it, is a step in development, from my experience. However, sometimes it comes (and keeps coming)in non apparent ways, in which I agree with you. Nevertheless, being able to distinguish between them in the constant flux of live, is not an easy task. 
Thanks for the effort of maintaining the blog, I find much truth in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although never isolated, C influence in a form of guru, master, guide, or whatever one wish to call it, is a step in development, from my experience. However, sometimes it comes (and keeps coming)in non apparent ways, in which I agree with you. Nevertheless, being able to distinguish between them in the constant flux of live, is not an easy task.<br />
Thanks for the effort of maintaining the blog, I find much truth in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oakfish</title>
		<link>http://unurthed.com/2009/10/21/mouravieffs-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-5239</link>
		<dc:creator>oakfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unurthed.com/?p=845#comment-5239</guid>
		<description>My present understanding according to some experiences of these A, B and C influences is somewhat different to Mouravieff&#039;s. I cannot understand what value-added there is in naming even two more influences. Higher (C) influence doesn&#039;t necessarily come only from another human being. No one, ever, is isolated in life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My present understanding according to some experiences of these A, B and C influences is somewhat different to Mouravieff&#8217;s. I cannot understand what value-added there is in naming even two more influences. Higher (C) influence doesn&#8217;t necessarily come only from another human being. No one, ever, is isolated in life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
